<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guide to social media jargon&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mackenzie.ag/2009/01/24/guide-to-social-media-jargon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mackenzie.ag/2009/01/24/guide-to-social-media-jargon/</link>
	<description>140 characters isn&#039;t always enough.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duane Nickull</title>
		<link>http://blog.mackenzie.ag/2009/01/24/guide-to-social-media-jargon/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Nickull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mackenzie.ag/?p=49#comment-8</guid>
		<description>But what is the opposite of &quot;going forward&quot;?  I always laughed when marketing coneheads said things like &quot; let&#039;s address this on a go forward basis...&quot;.  My usual reply is &quot; thanks for ruling out time travel.  You&#039;ve been helpful.&quot; instead of the usual &quot;die, die, die, AAARGH!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what is the opposite of &#8220;going forward&#8221;?  I always laughed when marketing coneheads said things like &#8221; let&#8217;s address this on a go forward basis&#8230;&#8221;.  My usual reply is &#8221; thanks for ruling out time travel.  You&#8217;ve been helpful.&#8221; instead of the usual &#8220;die, die, die, AAARGH!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
